Con­duct­ing pref­er­en­tial look­ing stud­ies with infants online: Unique chal­lenges and solutions

Lori­jn Zaad­no­ordijk, Trin­i­ty Col­lege Dublin
@LorijnSZ

YouTube

By load­ing the video, you agree to YouTube’s pri­va­cy pol­i­cy.
Learn more

Load video

Infant research fre­quent­ly relies on look­ing behav­ior. In many cog­ni­tive domains, look­ing time par­a­digms are used, for exam­ple, to assess what infants antic­i­pate, whether they can dis­crim­i­nate between stim­uli, or whether they have learned some­thing dur­ing the exper­i­ment. In addi­tion, recent­ly there has been renewed atten­tion to how infants’ look­ing behav­ior in their envi­ron­ment shapes what and how they learn. Infants are not pas­sive­ly receiv­ing infor­ma­tion, they active­ly seek it out by attend­ing to cer­tain types of organ­isms or objects over oth­ers at dif­fer­ent stages in development.

As such, ide­al­ly, devel­op­men­tal sci­en­tists could run large-scale, cross-sec­tion­al look­ing behav­ior and learn­ing stud­ies. Such stud­ies, unfor­tu­nate­ly, are time con­sum­ing and cost­ly. There has been increas­ing atten­tion to reduc­ing the costs and improv­ing the sam­ple sizes of exper­i­men­tal infant stud­ies, which are typ­i­cal­ly low in infant stud­ies (Bergmann, et al., 2018). The logis­tic and prac­ti­cal chal­lenges relat­ed to com­ing to the lab as well as the small age ranges can be iden­ti­fied as par­tial­ly respon­si­ble. Online data col­lec­tion offers the pos­si­bil­i­ty to acquire larg­er sam­ples as par­tic­i­pants can stay at home and par­tic­i­pate at a con­ve­nient time. This makes large-scale stud­ies more fea­si­ble in terms of both recruit­ment time as well as reach­ing a more diverse pop­u­la­tion. Being able to con­duct look­ing behav­ior stud­ies online would there­fore open excit­ing nov­el research possibilities.

How­ev­er, unlike in the lab, where state-of-the-art eye-track­ers may be avail­able, the look­ing data that is acquired online is based on a web­cam, which con­tains more noise and does not pro­vide the gaze direc­tion or a ref­er­ence axis to remove the effects of head motion. Man­u­al cod­ing of these data is labor-inten­sive and prone to day-to-day and inter­rater vari­abil­i­ty. An auto­mat­ed approach would thus be desir­able and improve repro­ducibil­i­ty. How­ev­er, although algo­rithms such as Ama­zon Recog­ni­tion can rel­a­tive­ly reli­ably indi­cate whether the infant is look­ing at the screen, detect­ing whether the infant is fix­at­ing on the left or right side of the screen is still prob­lem­at­ic (Chouinard, Scott & Cusack, 2019).

In addi­tion to test­ing infants online, we have been explor­ing meth­ods to improve the accu­ra­cy of gaze esti­ma­tion algo­rithms in online infant exper­i­ments. In this pre­sen­ta­tion, I will describe the unique chal­lenges that devel­op­men­tal sci­en­tists face when tran­si­tion­ing to online test­ing. I will touch upon a range of top­ics (from ethics to analy­ses) while describ­ing our expe­ri­ences with online look­ing behav­ior stud­ies and solu­tions we and oth­ers have explored. Final­ly, I will present var­i­ous state-of-the-art resources and ini­tia­tives that play a key role in online test­ing in the devel­op­men­tal sci­ence community.

Sign up for BeOnline

BeOnline is the conference to learn all about online behavioral research. It's the ideal place to discover the challenges and benefits of online research and to learn from pioneers. If that sounds interesting to you, then click the button below and register for the conference.

 

With thanks to our sponsors!

Con­duct­ing pref­er­en­tial look­ing stud­ies with infants online: Unique chal­lenges and solutions